hbarnard's blogHMRC and Parcelforce Clearance RacketNow, as in any underdeveloped and corrupt state, our 'officials' or 'civil servants' (some would call them lazy unproductive, error-prone parasites, not me, of course) are now charging extra for things that they are already paid to do. To wit, £8 or £13.50 for sticking on a label and then holding the item hostage until the 'fee' is paid. Doesn't that remind you of 'facilitation' fees that you pay elsewhere and are considered to be unethical, by various corporate hypocrites (the ones that have been caught, for example). Of course, the Post Office itself has a lot of form, viz a viz the postcodes robbery. Still we have to find the execrable Adam Crozier's £1M salary from somewhere, don't we, m'dears?
Goodbye Fruit and Nut: Hello Chocolate cheese spreadWell, I'm not buying anything from Cadbury as of today, another US buyout. Of course, the advisors are apparently RBS, so mummy's boy will pocket another big wad from this. It also turns out that they were busy stabbing Cadburys in the back. Good going for a publically owned bank and mummy's boy who didn't let anything approaching ethics or accepted practice restrain them. Incidentally the sleazy 'half-truth in advertising/teaser rate' Direct Line are an RBS subsidiary, don't buy anything from them either, at least until some of these parasites are thrown out. We lose one of our last big manufacturers and see nothing in return. Would you like chocolate cheese fries with that? Nice foreign war maybe? I don't think so..as they say.
Election Season: Top TipsWell, it's the election season again. Having been harangued during a TRA meeting and door-knocked by the massing hordes bearing a kind-of (pace, Jimmy Hendrix) wisdom. Here's my top tips for everyone from the conventional parties:
East End Life: From Spin to Misuse of Public FundsWell, the last round of discussion about the execrable, spintastic, inaccurate and childish (hey, choose an adjective!) East End Lies, the local Pradva produced by Tower Hamlets Council, met with some childish stonewalling from the 'complaints' department to quote Ms Dowden: The Council has answered your complaint and is not willing to enter into further correspondence on this matter Actually, all I've received is evasion and changes of subject, rather like a child caught in some trivial wrongdoing (except that council officers who create democratic deficit on purpose and try to ruin the local newspaper, that's not trivial, is it?). So I'm happy to see the battle has broken out elsewhere in a more high profile way.
Playing at Caring: BBC Children in NeedThe BBC helped raised £38 million for Children in Need last year. They were so inventive, funny and delightful and we were so generous! Hurrah for everybody! Let's look deeper, £38 mil is 1.2% of the BBCs current annual budget of 'about' £3 billion. This is the sort of figure that can be raised by simple economies in the BBC and a little tithing from these children of privilege. So we can find this £38 million via a little movement and generosity from the organisation itself. This is all public money too. So, the current contribution can be raised directly without involving all the expense of stunts, payments by the public to network operators for SMS messages, telethons and assorted crass paraphernalia. If both happen (not my preferred avenue, see below) then the amount is doubled. If overpaid people at the top tithe, the results are even better.
Democracy in Action: Control agenda styleIt's a warm afternoon, so, instead of working, I though I'd surf on down to the wretched No 10 e-petition site (more,
Public Choice Theory and the OlympicsWell, Coe-baby's £10billion egg and spoon race is a really good example of public choice theory at work. Public choice theory describes why politicians mainly do things that are against the public interest:
Don't use RaileasyJust booked my first and last rail ticket from Raileasy. They nickel and dime you a 'booking fee' and a debit card 'fee' and then provide 'phone lines' at £1 per minute, in case you want to ask anything. Also, they are in breach of European spam regulations, since the 'spam me' box is ticked on the submit page. Should be called Railsleazy, in fact, can everyone call it that from now on? To use the technical vocabulary: another bunch of sleazy corporate tossers .
Politicians and nappiesThis just in from Slashdot:
LBTH: How not to deal with graffitiWell, how we love those wacky folk up in their Mulberry fortress, dancing the denial-dance and publishing spin-o-rama aka Pravda aka East End Lies, their only tangible 'product' (apart from waste and expense, that is). They are so -cute-, if you'll forgive the American diction. Meanwhile, I started to run again today, along the Limehouse Cut and it's covered with a heavy, fresh crop of graffiti. A few random remarks about this:
|