In the last few days, I've received (apart from the putrescent East End Lies 'Press Pass Porky Benefits Borough', haha):
So, to distract us from expenses row, we are all to get smart meters, and life will become so much better. Hopefully, these smart meters will march on Westminster and Whitehall and conduct citizen's arrests of the confused, arrogant and lazy people that 'work' there.
Meanwhile, I asked Energywatch about this in 2004 and received a Sir Humphrey style letter (I'll put the scan up in a couple of days) saying that 'it was not cost effective for suppliers' (of course, the consumer is not in the equation at all, even at Energywatch indolence rules).
Here's something the BBC will not be discussing:
"Clearly there are some very innovative and clever people and they know our tactics," Cdr Broadhurst said. "They want to stop the City on the Wednesday - that is their avowed intention."
Anarchists by definition won't come and see us Cdr Bob Broadhurst
He said it was his aim to "facilitate lawful protest" and he revealed plans for a special demonstration pen near the Excel Centre to accommodate a few hundred protesters.
Now, a few other voices are saying that they're heavy-handed:
I wrote this brief paper about two years ago. With the current upsurge of enthusiasm in Hackney (but not in Tower Hamlets, devoted only to spin, fried chicken and influence trafficking) I'm putting it back into view. This is the second version, I hope is it's gradually becoming easier to read and more detailed.
We need to get as far as possible from being grant-funded-puppets into true sustainability (capital S perhaps, people tend to only think in terms of energy rather than thinking in terms of sustainable human activity including a refactored economy).
Tower Hamlets council, those masters of spin, have now reached new heights of cynicism, with their version of participatory budgeting: http://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/lgsl/851-900/867_council_-_consultation_-.... In short they have decided to throw £200K in used fivers (no comment on what these are left over from) to the proles who can 'decide' what they are to be spent on. Here's a few comments about this:
We're spending about £12bn on 'an undertaking of great advantage, but nobody to know what it is' somewhere within the field of healthcare informatics. This particular project has been extensively criticised by many distinguished university computing departments and more-or-less, the whole industry outside dotgov.
Of course, Gordo (ex-TV journalist, weak at maths: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6589263.stm, clown school dropout -sorry I made that last bit up-) and the Sir Humphries (studied classics, ego-size = budget-size-wasted x K | G ) plough on regardless.
There's a preliminary version with some skeletion documentation on the Cclite page. I think the XP version is more to gain familiarity rather than to use industrially though.
In Limehouse, we've spent about two years working with the Safer Neighbourhoods Team with some success. The relationship is usually good. At the moment, the area is less turbulent and probably less druggy. However, random intruders still turn up in our blocks to drink and (probably) drug, piss and vomit in our stairwells and common areas.